cim vic jader CPU, tim pomalejsi
Miroslav Lachman
000.fbsd at quip.cz
Tue Mar 30 01:59:03 CEST 2021
On 30/03/2021 00:45, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Ani jsem netusil, ze VirtualBox neco takoveho umi, takze jsem zase o
> neco chytrejsi. No u me to vypada, ze kdyz mu pridelim 6 jader, tak i
> guest vidi 6 jader. Zkusim to ted rebootovat a zvednout to na 10 a
> pozorne si prohlidnout, jestli jich je skutecne 10.
Opravdu system vidi 10 jader
FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 10 core(s)
Problem je, ze je s temi 10 jadry opravdu neuveritelne pomaly. Takhle to
vypadalo ctvrt hodiny po rebootu (v noci, kdy je na serveru minimalni
provoz a zatez by mela byt okolo 10% / load 1)
last pid: 3561; load averages: 20.78, 14.75, 8.14 up 0+00:16:32
01:15:55
170 processes: 14 running, 152 sleeping, 1 zombie, 3 lock
CPU: 26.3% user, 0.0% nice, 65.6% system, 8.1% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 1913M Active, 321M Inact, 1913M Wired, 1563M Buf, 12G Free
Swap: 2047M Total, 2047M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
1348 root 1 -16 0 6852K 2940K CPU5 5 6:57 111.36% pfctl
3093 www 1 78 0 185M 59940K CPU4 4 0:03 92.79% httpd
811 mysql 75 20 0 4806M 1345M select 2 3:17 57.92% mysqld
3086 www 1 52 0 187M 45504K select 3 0:18 48.35% httpd
3089 www 1 33 0 185M 57304K CPU0 0 0:12 46.55% httpd
3012 www 1 52 0 198M 64900K lockf 6 0:18 43.90% httpd
3098 www 1 80 0 187M 71556K RUN 2 0:06 39.39% httpd
3015 www 1 82 0 193M 68112K CPU3 3 0:20 36.74% httpd
3021 www 1 52 0 185M 75052K select 6 0:14 29.85% httpd
3024 www 1 52 0 187M 74820K RUN 1 0:12 21.30% httpd
3087 www 1 78 0 187M 85288K RUN 5 0:15 18.51% httpd
3022 www 1 25 0 185M 56596K select 2 0:12 17.54% httpd
3095 www 1 52 0 187M 70400K RUN 3 0:16 16.00% httpd
1357 postfix 1 23 0 48104K 12660K select 0 0:06 14.71% smtpd
3091 www 1 77 0 187M 55568K RUN 0 0:13 14.12% httpd
3099 www 1 52 0 189M 75456K lockf 9 0:09 12.67% httpd
3071 www 1 36 0 187M 59348K lockf 3 0:12 11.83% httpd
Zkusil jsem to jeste s 8 jadry a to vypadalo skoro stejne spatne jako s
10, se 7 jadry uz to bylo o neco lepsi. Ted jsem to zkusil se 4 jadry a
system je skutecne temer bez zateze
last pid: 3354; load averages: 0.76, 0.68, 0.40 up 0+00:09:06
01:55:56
109 processes: 1 running, 107 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU: 4.1% user, 0.0% nice, 1.1% system, 0.1% interrupt, 94.7% idle
Mem: 1907M Active, 456M Inact, 1886M Wired, 1563M Buf, 11G Free
Swap: 2047M Total, 2047M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
1389 www 1 23 0 194M 134M select 0 0:24 14.53% httpd
812 mysql 50 20 0 4765M 1339M select 3 0:27 2.95% mysqld
595 root 1 20 0 7152K 3308K select 3 0:04 1.14% p0f
970 nobody 10 20 0 73832K 34284K kqread 3 0:03 0.62%
memcached
1433 root 1 20 0 7812K 3992K select 2 0:00 0.08% tmux
1454 root 1 20 0 7912K 4316K CPU0 0 0:00 0.05% top
1236 root 1 20 0 185M 35144K select 3 0:00 0.02% httpd
1459 www 1 22 0 194M 128M select 3 0:19 0.01% httpd
842 mailnull 1 20 0 6304K 2232K select 0 0:00 0.01% postsrsd
567 root 1 20 0 12636K 8084K select 3 0:00 0.01% proftpd
459 root 1 20 0 6420K 2440K select 1 0:00 0.01% syslogd
300 root 1 20 0 9168K 5040K select 3 0:00 0.01% devd
1358 www 1 20 0 202M 137M lockf 0 0:15 0.01% httpd
Porovnaval jsem nastaveni virtualu s tim, co poslal Dan a krome
vypnuteho PAE tam byly ty podstatne veci stejne. Tak jsem zkusil zapnout
PAE, ale zadny rozdil v tom chovani nepozoruji.
Mirek
More information about the Users-l
mailing list