Portmaster prepisuje balicek

[Miroslav Lachman]

Miroslav Prymek wrote:
> Zdravim,
>
> nedari se mi primet portmaster, aby se choval takhle:
>
> 1. pokud existuje predprelozeny balicek ve spravne verzi, pouzij ho
> 2. pokud neexistuje, preloz port a vytvor balicek
>
> Konkretne dochazi (zda se mi) k tomu, ze balicek vytvari VZDY - tj. napred software
> nainstaluje z balicku a pak balicek znovu vytvori :(
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> # portmaster  -B -HgDP  -v ports-mgmt/pkg_tree
> [...]
> ===>>>  Available package (perl-5.10.1_3) matches the current version
> ===>>>  Package exists, skipping fetch
>
> ===>>>  Starting check for runtime dependencies
> ===>>>  Gathering dependency list for lang/perl5.10 from ports
> ===>>>  No dependencies for lang/perl5.10
> ===>>>  Installing package
> Cleaning up /etc/make.conf... Done.
> Spamming /etc/make.conf... Done.
> Cleaning up /etc/manpath.config... Done.
> Spamming /etc/manpath.config... Done.
>
> ===>>>  Creating a package for new version perl-5.10.1_3
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Za normalnich okolnosti by to ani moc nevadilo, ale me to stve, protoze potrebuju,
> aby uz jednou prelozene veci zustaly provzdy takove, jake jsou...

Cemu to vlastne vadi? Pokud se nepletu, tak portmaster pouziva pro ruzne 
balicky ruzna uloziste.
Takze napriklad balicky, ktere ma pouzit pro instalovani z lockal 
packages ma v ceste --local-packagedir=<path>
Pred odinstalovanim (pri upgrade) balicky zase uklada do 
/usr/ports/packages/portmaster-backup/
No a do /usr/ports/packages/All se ukladaji ty portmasterem vytvarene.
Tudiz neni problem to nakonfigurovat tak, aby byly kazde jinde a 
nepomichaly se.

Jinak ano, pormtaster vytvari balicek vzdy, je-li o to pozadan 
konfiguraci v ~/.postmasterrc nebo pomoci parametru (-g  create a 
package of the new port). Jinak by ho vytvaret nemel vubec. Pokud ho 
vytvari vzdy (nezkousel jsem), tak je dobre to Dougovi nahlasit (a v 
kopii na ports na freebsd.org) a on to urcite mile rad opravi.

> Da se tohodle chovani nejak zbavit? Chova se portupgrade inteligentneji?

Jak se chova portupgrade nevim, protoze se v jinych vecech choval 
nevhodne, prestal jsem ho po letech pouzivat a presel prave na 
portmaster, ktery je v mem pouziti mnohem predvidatelnejsi (a aktivne 
vyvijen)

Mirek